Cumulative procurement spend in host communities

This table shows how procurement spend is distributed across host-community proximity zones, helping illustrate where supplier value is captured — from near‑mine communities through to national suppliers. This table is linked to MMG’s Local and regional development material topic KPI on in‑country procurement spend distribution across near‑mine/district, provincial/state and national levels.

Rotate your device for the best view
Last updated on 16 April 2026 at 10:15am, Hong Kong time (HKT)
Cumulative procurement spend in host communities data table
Site Near-mine / district level (Zone 1) % (Zone 1) Provincial / State level (Zone 2) % (Zone 2) National level (Zone 3) % (Zone 3) Total Spend
Dugald River 18779.75 5.51% 178633.09 52.40% 323363.23 94.85% 340927.53
Exploration 3185.14 18.70% 3231.17 18.97% 15412.32 90.48% 17033.72
Head Office 13313.80 17.39% 15763.70 20.59% 57263.09 74.80% 76549.88
Khoemacau 109872.91 26.49% 116001.80 27.97% 346524.80 83.54% 414790.78
Kinsevere 273482.21 65.11% 300842.54 71.63% 316138.18 75.27% 420018.27
Rosebery 18015.09 9.96% 88080.01 48.71% 179730.51 99.39% 180834.71
Las Bambas 188326.25 10.12% 224695.44 12.07% 1509329.57 81.07% 1861741.01
  • Procurement spend: Total value of goods and services procured from suppliers, reported in USD and attributed to the site/operational unit where used or delivered.
  • Zone definitions:

    • Zone 1 – Near‑mine / District level: suppliers in local townships/districts/municipalities surrounding the site.
    • Zone 2 – Provincial / State level: suppliers registered in the same province/state as the operation.
    • Zone 3 – National level: suppliers located within the host country outside Zones 1 and 2.
  • Total spend: Zone 1 + Zone 2 + Zone 3 = Total spend (per site).
  • Percentages: % in Zone = (Zone spend ÷ Total spend for site) × 100.